Pretoria, South Africa
August 23, 2004
The Food
Pricing Monitoring Committee appointed by the
Minister of Agriculture and
Land Affairs, Ms Thoko Didiza, in January 2003 has completed
its second report and submitted it to the office of the Minister
early this year.
The various analyses of food retail prices
reported in the Report clearly confirm the initial sharp
increase in basic food commodity prices (notably maize). This
initial shock then spread through several food value chains
followed by a levelling off of price increases for virtually all
food items, and even a decline for some products (red meat,
maize meal, samp and cooking oil). However, while it is true
that these prices came down from their peak in 2002 and early
2003, in all cases, the decline was not as large as the initial
increases during 2001/2002. When considering the period (Jan -
Oct 2003) over which the Committee monitored food prices, the
trends reflect price declines for 11 out of 24 monitored by the
Committee. The data does show a few anomalies, for instance for
products such as milk powder, peanut butter, margarine and
onions, of which the prices have increased too far above food
price inflation in 2003.
The analysis of food price inflation for different income groups
shows that poor households experienced higher inflation rates
than wealthier households. At its peak, in October 2002, poor
households were confronted with a year-on-year food price
inflation of 23.1% while richer households experienced a food
price inflation of 19%. The benefit to the poor of the recently
lowered prices for most staple foods is reflected in a food
inflation rate of 3.35% compared to that of richer households of
4.21%.
The fact that the Committee received virtually no inputs and
complaints from the public through the toll-free number and
e-mail line after June 2003 provided some indication that food
price inflation abated, and that consumers did not pick up any
extraordinary increases. The monitoring process by the Committee
also found no 'sharp' increases in food prices in the period
since its appointment. The existence of the monitoring
mechanism, increased public awareness as well as improved and
more stable macro-economic conditions all assisted in achieving
slower food price inflation and even resulted in food price
reductions in some cases.
The Committee's analysis shows that in September 2003 the total
cost of the basket of food items monitored by the Committee was
only 1.5% cheaper than in September 2002, which confirms the
sentiment expressed by consumers. Recent statistics (June 2004)
based on the National Agricultural Marketing Council (NAMC)
database of consumer prices suggest that the same basket of food
is now 3% cheaper than in December 2003.
Thus, although the market structure allows the opportunity for
predatory and unjust pricing, there is limited evidence that
this actually happened. What the analyses of the Committee do
show is that all price increases seemed to follow trends in the
prices of raw materials, other costs and the exchange rate.
This, plus the results of most of the supply chain
investigations provide sufficient evidence that collusive and
unfair business practices are not prevalent.
The Committee made 16 recommendations along five main themes:
* Strategic grain reserves
* Direct government programmes
* Improved agricultural information systems
* Increasing competition and reducing barriers to entry
* SAFEX rules, transport and logistics
The department looked into the following recommendations made by
cabinet:
* (The continuation and expansion of food pricing monitoring
function throughout the country):
Government has tasked the National Agricultural Marketing
Council to expand from its existing scale of coverage to cover
the entire country.
* (Strengthening the capacity of the department to collect
Agricultural Statistics and information):
Government has already increased the budget allocation from the
current R11.8 million to R14 million in order to facilitate the
implementation of this recommendation.
* (That Government facilitates the coordination and
strengthening of community public private partnerships on food
and nutrition programmes in general and food relief and
emergencies in particular):
The Minister of Social Development on behalf of government
through the distribution of food parcels to more than 244
thousand households. The DoA is taking a lead on the
implementation of the Integrated Food Security and Nutrition
Programme, which is aimed at alleviating food insecurity amongst
the impoverished households.
* (The establishment of a task team to further analyse and
benchmark the performance of strategic food value chains in
order to improve their performance, efficiency, competitiveness
and the ability to manage food supply risks):
The government has noted this recommendation and work is done in
this regard.
The report will also be available on the department's website:
http://www.nda.agric.za or
by phoning this number 012 319 7141.
Source:
Graan Suid-Afrika
Issued by: Department of Agriculture
20 August 2004
Title: Final report of Food Monitoring Committee released |