December 15, 2004
Source:
AgAnswers, an Ohio State University and Purdue Extension
Partnership
Chlorothalonil.
Propiconazole.
Azoxystrobin.
Farmers
might need a pronunciation key to sound out the words. In the
months to come the fungicide ingredient names are likely to roll
off their tongues much easier, however, as producers prepare to
plant the first soybean crop in the continental United States
threatened by soybean rust.
"Fungicides
will be a new experience for most soybean farmers in Indiana and
throughout the Corn Belt," said Greg Shaner, a Purdue University
Extension plant pathologist. "Most growers have never used a
foliar fungicide, so there will be questions about what products
are available, how to use them and when to use them for
effective disease control."
Fungicide
is the only effective treatment for controlling soybean rust, a
fungal disease that can dramatically reduce a soybean crop's
yields. The fungus, Phakopsora pachyrhizi, is spread from field
to field by airborne spores. One month ago the U.S. Department
of Agriculture announced that rust had been found in a Louisiana
soybean field. Since then, the USDA has confirmed the presence
of rust in eight other states as far north as Missouri and
Tennessee.
Experts
believe Hurricane Ivan carried rust spores from
South America to the mainland
United States
in September.
Shaner is
among a team of plant pathologists from soybean-producing states
working with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to secure
emergency use status for fungicide ingredients not previously
approved for use on soybeans. The "Section 18" requests have
added four fungicide chemicals to the five that were already
registered for soybean use through the EPA.
"Among the
fungicides that are either currently approved or that we
anticipate being approved, we have four different chemical
groups," Shaner said. "Those represent four different modes of
action.
"One reason
for seeking registration for more fungicide materials was so
that farmers would be able to use different modes of action. The
reason for doing that is because if everybody was using the same
kind of fungicide there's a good chance that the rust fungus
would adapt to it and become resistant and, therefore, the
fungicides wouldn't be effective."
Fungicides
come in two basic types: those that form a protective barrier on
the outside of the soybean plant and those that work from the
inside out.
"Among the
fungicides that will be used on soybean rust there's one group
-- the chlorothalonil products -- which are strictly protectant.
They just form a coating on the surface of the plant and are not
absorbed by the plant," Shaner said.
"The other
fungicides that either are labeled for use or are in the process
of review, are what we call systemic. They are absorbed by the
plant but they don't move throughout the entire plant. They move
toward the tips of leaves and they may move from leaves that are
sprayed into new growth but they don't move down in the plant.
So they're not truly systemic in the sense of when people take
an antibiotic and it moves through the bloodstream throughout
the body."
Fungicide
ingredients approved or granted emergency use status for soybean
rust in Indiana, and brand-name products that contain them,
include:
-
Chlorothalonil (protectant) -- Bravo, Echo 720
-
Azoxystrobin (systemic) -- Quadris
-
Propiconazole (systemic) -- Tilt, PropiMax, Bumper
-
Tebuconazole (systemic) -- Folicur
-
Myclobutanil (systemic) -- Laredo
-
Pyraclostrobin (systemic) -- Headline
-
Tetraconazole (systemic) -- Domark
-
Propiconazole plus Trifloxystrobin (systemic) -- Stratego
-
Pyraclostrobin plus Boscalid (systemic) -- Pristine
"Systemic
fungicides are a little better in the sense that if you don't
have uniform coverage on the soybean plant when you make the
initial application, the internal redistribution that you'll get
will make up for some of those deficiencies," Shaner said. "On
the other hand, with protectant fungicides if you only manage to
cover 30 percent of the leaf area, then the other 70 percent is
unprotected."
Not only
will farmers be learning new chemical names and modes of action,
but also new application skills. Applying fungicide is not the
same as using herbicides and insecticides, Shaner said.
"Two areas
will be different" than using other chemical inputs, Shaner
said. "One is that for many herbicides, complete coverage of the
weed isn't that critical. If you get a critical dose of
herbicide on the weed the herbicide is absorbed and then it
kills the plant. With fungicides, good coverage of the soybean
leaves that are present at the time of application is very
important. So there will be some issues about the droplet size
and the ability of the spray to penetrate down into the canopy
that will be a bit different from what farmers have been
accustomed to in applying herbicides.
"The other
critical issue in using fungicides against soybean rust is to
get an application on when the disease first appears. If a
farmer waits until there's enough rust that it really begins to
look serious, it's too late."
Fungicide
treatments, including product and application, are expected to
cost farmers between $14 per acre and $35 per acre.
For more
information about soybean rust, visit the Purdue Plant and Pest
Diagnostic Laboratory soybean rust page at
http://www.ppdl.purdue.edu/PPDL/soybean_rust.html or the
Purdue Agricultural Communication soybean rust page at
http://www.agriculture.purdue.edu/soybeanrust/ . |