Fayetteville, Arkansas
October 5, 2004
Insect pests can severely damage
Arkansas crops, but the plants are not exactly defenseless when
under attack.
Plants possess some means to defend themselves against chewing
insects, said Dr. Ken Korth,
University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture plant
pathologist.
“Self defense often involves the production of chemicals in the
plant that are distasteful or toxic to insects,” Korth said.
“Other chemicals can be released from insect-injured leaves that
attract enemies of the insects damaging the plant.
“This type of natural defense doesn’t have to be sprayed on,
it’s always there,” he said. “It’s targeted specifically to the
insects that are causing the damage and doesn’t harm those that
are beneficial to the plants.”
Beneficial insects include those that feed on the pests,
reducing their impact on crops.
With funding from the Division of Agriculture, USDA and the
Arkansas Rice Research and Promotion Board, Korth and graduate
student Karen Gomez of Santa Cruz, Bolivia, are studying the
genetics of how plants protect themselves. Armed with such
information, plant breeders could develop crop plants that are
less reliant on chemical pesticides.
“We’re asking, ‘what is the plant’s defense strategy?’” Korth
said. “How does the plant defend itself, and how can we tap into
that and enhance those defenses?”
Korth has identified genes that encode proteins he believes are
involved in defense. “These genes and proteins are active in
damaged plants and not in undamaged plants,” he said.
He uses Medicago truncatala, a relative of alfalfa that
is a good research model because the plant’s genetics have been
mapped. “What we learn from it can be applied to rice or other
plants,” he said.
To see how the genes react, undamaged plants are compared with
plants that have been chewed on by caterpillars. A third set of
plants is damaged mechanically.
The defensive genes go to work only on the plants damaged by the
caterpillars.
In another test, mechanically damaged plants responded when
regurgitated matter from the caterpillars was applied to the
damaged tissues.
“Our tests show there is a chemical response to insect damage
that is different from purely mechanical damage,” Korth said.
“A plant senses the biological damage from a chewing insect and
responds chemically to protect itself.”
Gomez is researching how the plants respond to individual
purified chemicals from caterpillar regurgitant in order to
understand how much response each one sparks.
“We’re looking for genetic markers for plant defense traits that
plant breeders can use to produce improved crop varieties,”
Korth said. “The challenge is connecting the gene with the trait
desired.”
He said this area of research is still at an early stage and a
lot of work remains before the results are useful for plant
breeders.
“Down the road, it could provide another, targeted layer of
protection for crops,” he said. |