Winnipeg,
Manitoba
July 14, 2005Most
prairie canola growers surveyed for the
Canola Council of Canada
report that herbicide tolerant canola volunteers are as easy to
manage as conventional canola volunteers.
JoAnne Buth is vice-president
of production for the Canola Council. She says the Council
commissioned Serecon Management Consulting to call western
Canadian canola growers in the summer of 2004 to find out how
they managed volunteer canola weeds following conventional
canola and three herbicide tolerant (HT) systems - Roundup
Ready, Liberty Link/InVigor and CLEARFIELD.
Buth says the results of that
survey of 335 farmers combined with the previous three years of
information from the federal government's Prairie Weed Survey
plus economic modeling of herbicide options and costs showed
that “growers have a good handle on controlling canola
volunteers following all canola systems”.
Buth says the study revealed
more similarities than differences. "We discovered that,
regardless of the system, farmers rarely targeted volunteer
canola as the primary broadleaf weed to be controlled with a
herbicide", she says. "Farmers were more concerned about taking
care of wild oats, wild buckwheat and Canada thistle."
The study showed that few
canola growers even target herbicide treatments or tillage
operations specifically for volunteer canola. And Buth says the
majority of canola growers surveyed had not changed their weed
management practices to control volunteer HT canola volunteers
over conventional canola volunteers.
She says growers reported that
controlling volunteer canola is just part of their overall
management plan.
In fact, Buth says most of the
surveyed growers could not specify how much of their weed
control dollar was specifically spent controlling volunteer
canola. Those who could break down their costs reported no
incremental application costs to control Roundup Ready
volunteers. They just added a low-cost herbicide to their
glyphosate pre-seed burn-off treatment.
Buth says growers of other
systems, including conventional canola, more often added their
broadleaf tank-mix to their in-crop grassy weed herbicide
treatment.
The study revealed no
significant differences in costs of volunteer canola control
following any of the systems. "Growers estimated herbicide
treatment costs of $10 to $13 an acre for herbicides and about
$5 an acre for tillage control," Buth adds.
"This was an important finding
and shows that the decision to grow HT canola crops does not
result in additional herbicide costs in subsequent years,” she
says. “In fact, the previous study the Canola Council conducted
showed that using HT canola crops actually resulted in a
significant decrease in herbicide costs and increased overall
farm profit."
In addition, nearly 60 % of
surveyed growers who planted HT varieties in 2003 actually
reported a carry-over weed control benefit to the 2004 crop.
Buth points out however, that no carry-over weed benefits were
detected in the Prairie Weed Survey data.
Buth says about half the
growers reporting a benefit put a dollar value on it of almost
$12 an acre. "That's roughly the cost of product and application
of a typical glyphosate treatment", she figures, “and would
offset any incremental cost of controlling the volunteers the
next year.”
"All in all," Buth says, "the
majority of growers of herbicide tolerant canola continue to
support the premise that the benefits of growing these varieties
are greater that the benefits of growing conventional canola."
2004 survey results in PDF
format:
http://www.canola-council.org/PDF/Herbicide_Tolerant_Fact_Sheet.pdf |