February 24, 2005
USDA/FAS GAIN Report - GMO
Situation in Germany - 2005
Approved by: Richard
Petges, U.S. Embassy
Prepared by: Dietmar Achilles
Report
Highlights:
About 100
farmers registered fields for planting Bt corn in 2005. If all
those fields are finally planted to a GMO variety,
Germany's total GMO crop area is expected to amount to 1000
hectares.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
-
Executive Summary
-
Bt Corn Production in 2005
-
Bt Corn Variety Registration
-
Accompanying Research for GMO
Crop Production
-
German Monitoring Rules for
GMO Crops
-
Opposition Demands a Reform of the Genetech Law
-
Constitutional Claim against the German Genetech Law
-
Ongoing Greenpeace Campaign
against GMOs
There
are small indications that the rejection of agricultural
biotechnology by German politicians and parts of the media is
slowly diminishing. Politicians of the opposition parties
aggressively use the argument that the new German genetech law
inhibits economic progress. They are blaming the current
governing coalition parties of damaging the image of a
progressive German economy and society. It appears that more
farmers will grow GMO corn in 2005 than did in 2004. However,
Greenpeace is not giving up its efforts to ‘educate’ the Germans
that GMOs are an important and dangerous evil.
For the
2005 production year, about 100 German farmers registered fields
for the planting of Bt corn. The German genetech law, which
came into effect in February 2005, requires farmers to report
the exact location of GMO fields, field size and the GMO trait
to a national public register, the Standortregister.
Farmers
have to report their GMO planting intention any time from nine
months to three months before actual planting. For crop year
2005, farmers have indicated intentions to plant nearly 1,000
hectares of GMO corn, predominantly varieties containing the
Monsanto trait MON810. In 2004, almost 300 hectares were
planted to GMO corn.
Since
there are no GMO varieties yet approved for planting in Germany,
seed producers have to source seeds from those approved for use
in Spain. Based on the German seed law requirement, seed
producers need to obtain a marketing permit for these Spanish
varieties from the German Federal Seeds Register (BSA), which is
under the supervision of the Federal Ministry of Consumer
Protection, Food and Agriculture (BMVEL). The permission was
finally granted on 24 Feb 2005.
In a
joint press statement of the feed manufacturer Maerka Maerkische
Kraftfutter and Monsanto Germany, Maerka made a promise to the
farmers in the Brandenburg region to offer the same price for
the corn grown in the neighborhood of GMO corn fields as they
would pay for other corn regardless of the level of GMO
presence. Maerka assured that they will carefully test
delivered corn for the level of GMO presence.
The seed producers are currently in the process of negotiating
similar assurances with other feed manufacturers so that all
corn producing farmers in the neighborhood of GMO corn fields
will be able to sell their crop at normal market prices.
In 2000,
2001 and 2003 German seed breeders applied for the official
registration of five Bt corn varieties at BSA. Obligatory
planting tests required by the German seeds law and performed
under the supervision of BSA have been successfully finalized.
In case of conventional seeds (non-GMO varieties), BSA
autonomously decides whether or not to register the new
varieties. In the case of GMO varieties, BMVEL is actively
involved in the approval process. Although not required at the
time, one of BMVEL’s core concerns in this case is the seed
producers’ lack of a monitoring plan for GMO crops. According
to a press report, Greenpeace Germany is intensively lobbying
BMVEL not to register the new varieties. The next BSA meeting
on variety registration is scheduled for early May 2005.
The
registration of Bt corn varieties in Germany would eliminate the
need to obtain special marketing permits for these GM
varieties. It would also allow for unlimited planting of GMO
seed. The special permit only allows for the marketing of up to
five tons of seed per approved variety.
The
results of a 2004 coexistence research program involving 300
hectares of Bt corn, were officially provided to BMVEL. The
research was financed by the State of Sachsen-Anhalt and the
Federal Ministry of Research (BMBF). The Federal Biological
Research Institute (BBA) originally had planned to participate
in this project but was ordered by BMVEL not to take part in the
program. BMVEL now claims that this study is not sufficient to
evaluate the cross-pollination risk of corn. Therefore, in
2005, BMVEL will initiate a study to research the dispersion of
corn pollen. For this project, non-GMO varieties of yellow and
white corn will be used.
Press
articles indicate that BMVEL continues to prevent leading BBA
genetech researchers from participating in coexistence research
with real GMO products, even if these projects are supported and
financed by BMBF. There have also been cases during recent
years where BMVEL stopped federally funded biotech research in
projects which could potentially provide significant variety
improvement, such as resistance to fire blight in apple trees.
Recently, the coalition government approved a draft proposal of
monitoring rules for the commercial planting of GMO crops. This
draft needs to pass through the German Bundesrat where the
opposition parties are in the majority. During the past year
representatives of the opposition parties have repeatedly
publicly expressed their opposition to the restrictive German
genetech law. It is very likely that the opposition will
request changes to the proposed monitoring rules, and possibly
also changes to the basic genetech law, which just became
effective in early February 2005.
The
biotech industry complains that the proposed monitoring rules
require GMO seed producers to collect of an excessive amount of
data, which will in effect prevent the use of GMO crops. It
leaves the impression that the seed producer has to perform a
full-blown risk assessment each time he produces seed on GMO
traits, which have already been approved based on a previous
review and risk assessment. Some of the requirements are worded
so vaguely that it appears that interpretation will be a major
factor in determining whether or not the seed company is in
compliance with the rules. The German industry complains that
these rules go way beyond the requirements laid down in EU
Directive 2001/18 and the monitoring parameters proposed by
EFSA. Some of the requirements are as follows: The risk of any
negative impact on health and environment should be excluded at
all times. (The genetech law is based on EU Directive 2001/18,
which does not cover health and food safety aspects. These are
regulated under EU Regulation 1829/2003.) Data should not only
be collected in the actual field planted to the GMO crop but
also in the neighborhood to the field (distances and monitoring
periods are not exactly defined). All environments, which could
eventually be impacted by the GMO should be monitored. These
‘receptive milieus’ should be compared with data resulting from
‘control milieus’ not in contact with GMOs.
The German
Bundestag is currently debating the second portion of the German
genetech law (see GM4022 + GM4051), which primarily covers
administrative issues of actually minor importance to the
biotech industry. Those are technical or legalistic matters
determining issues such as which authorities in the German
states (Laender) are responsible for the monitoring of biotech
crop production, who carries the financial burden for this work,
etc. These are all detailing regulations attached to the basic
genetech law, and require the approval of the Bundesrat, the
Chamber of the German Laender. And this is the crux: The
opposition parties are in the majority in the Bundesrat and
intend to use this leverage to request adjustments to the basic
law to make it somewhat more practical and less restrictive. It
is too early to determine to what extent this will be possible.
The
government of the State of Sachsen-Anhalt announced its intent
to file a constitutional claim against the recently past
genetech law. Sachsen-Anhalt Econ Minister Rehberger argues
that the law discriminates against GMO farmers. Rehberger was a
strong supporter of the test production of GMO corn in 2004.
The specific target of Greenpeace in
February 2005 has been restaurants and cafeterias. A group of
Greenpeace activists called ‘Team50plus”, people of the age of
50 years or older, is visiting restaurants and checking out what
kind of vegetable oils are used and if the use of GMO soy oils
is properly labeled in the menu cards. Some of the names of the
visited restaurants, some of which are prominent restaurants,
are published on the Greenpeace homepage. Restaurants, which
are not properly labeling the use of GMO oils risk being fined
up to Euro 50,000 (US$65,000).
|