Saint Louis, Missouri
February 7, 2006
The American Soybean
Association (ASA) today hailed reports that a World Trade
Organization (WTO) dispute settlement panel had sided with
the United States, Canada, and Argentina who had argued that
the European Union’s (EU) review process for biotech
commodities was broken and unfairly restricted trade. While
welcoming this WTO ruling against Europe’s flawed and
non-science based approval process, ASA called on the Bush
Administration to promptly mount a WTO challenge against
Europe’s discriminatory traceability and labeling laws that
apply to biotech crops.
“This favorable WTO ruling
should only be seen as ‘step one’ of the actions against
Europe’s unjustified and unscientific policies toward
biotechnology,” said Rick Ostlie, ASA First Vice President
and a soybean producer from Northwood, N.D. “What must now
follow is the more important ‘step two’, which is a WTO
challenge of the EU’s unfair traceability and labeling laws
which are costing U.S. soybean growers hundreds of millions
of dollars in lost sales each year.”
In 1997 the EU introduced
mandatory labeling requirements for all foods with
detectable presence of ingredients derived from biotech
crops. In March 2004 the EU implemented new legislation that
significantly broadened the scope of those labeling
requirements. Labeling is now required for all foods and
feeds that contain or consist of biotech products,
regardless of whether that presence is detectable through
testing.
“The EU imposed these
requirements despite repeated pronouncements by EU
scientific committees that biotech foods and feeds are
entirely safe,” Ostlie said. “Indeed, many EU leaders have
admitted that the labels serve no food safety purpose.
Nevertheless, consumers perceive the labels as health
warnings, and most EU food companies and retailers have
therefore decided against marketing labeled foods. As a
result, U.S. exports of biotech products to the EU,
including U.S. soybeans, have fallen sharply.”
In quantity terms, U.S.
soybean exports to the EU have fallen from 8.3 million
metric tons (304.9 million bushels) in 1996 to 3.7 million
metric tons (135.9 million bushels) in 2004. Between 2002
and 2004, there was a drop of 39 percent. The most important
factor in this slide is the declining demand among EU food
manufacturers and retailers for soybean oil and other food
products derived from U.S. soybeans.
Between marketing years 1996/97
and 2003/04, a period during which food companies were
reformulating their products and seeking new sources of supply
in anticipation of the new labeling rules, soybean oil’s share
of the total EU vegetable oil market fell from 19 percent to 13
percent. At the same time, the proportion of soybean oil on the
EU market that comes from U.S. soybeans was falling even more
rapidly. From 1996 to 2004 the U.S. share of EU soybean imports
decreased from 61 percent to 27 percent. At the same time, the
share of imports from Brazil, which until recently denied
producing biotech soybeans, rose from 22 percent to 64 percent.
“With this WTO victory fresh in
hand against Europe’s discriminatory biotech system, the United
States and our allies must now challenge Europe’s even more
egregious biotech traceability and labeling rules,” continued
Ostlie. “These unfair and non-science based rules are costing
U.S. soybeans farmers and U.S. food companies hundreds of
millions of dollars in lost sales each year. ASA looks forward
to working closely with U.S. Trade Representative Portman and
others in the Administration to mount such a WTO challenge.”
The American Soybean
Association is the policy, domestic marketing, new uses,
research and international marketing advocate of the U.S.
soybean farmer. ASA is a membership organization representing
26,000 soybean producers. It's mission is to improve U.S.
soybean farmer profitability. |